"Naturalness is whatever occurs between human interventions." Richard Mabey (The Ash and the Beech)
Young oak with marble gall - interaction between plant and animal occurs at an early stage
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34fa0/34fa01541762a459e3ccb3ce723fa6dcc0e46a41" alt="" |
Naturally regenerating woodland at Holders; from acorns probably planted by Jays. These trees are likely to contribute to prime Oak woodlands but alas way beyond our life time |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41d63/41d63a34f87f839b8e8a89d72ae8c6bd3ff744e0" alt="" |
These self set oaks range between 1 year and 40-50 years |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/455c6/455c67aaa19539cdb4fd75497d66b20e2ebdbfb8" alt="" |
In Contrast the 'Millennium Oak' Plantation at Highbury (circa 2000) |
The debate here concerns the planting and /or natural development of new woodland. I believe it was Richard Mabey (source to be verified) who said that most planted trees are 'planted in the wrong place', and I take this to mean that a planted tree is unlikely to do as well over a long term as a naturally occurring tree, grown as it stands from seed. Who knows? difficult to say for certain how long a tree can be expected to live. There is a life expectancy for all living things and this depends on many variable factors.
This table from the above publication considers the pros and cons of introducing plants to new woodland - decisions have to be made and either way it's not clear cut.
Comments
Post a Comment